IA3 MIN

Suno loses in Munich: German court rules the AI music firm violated the copyright of six songs

It's Europe's first ruling against a music-generating AI. The court found it proven that Suno memorised and reproduced six songs from GEMA's catalogue during training — Forever Young, Mambo No. 5 and Daddy Cool among them — and ordered the company to disclose how much it has earned from them.

A robot rocker in a leather jacket holding a microphone, official Suno brand imagery
Image: Suno
01

The court doesn't talk about inspiration: it talks about copying during training

The songs that come out of Suno sound new, but the Munich Regional Court ruled this 31 July that six of the ones that went in never really left. German collecting society GEMA, which manages rights for around 100,000 composers, convinced the court with side-by-side comparisons: recognisable melodies, harmonies and rhythms from Alphaville's Forever Young, Lou Bega's Mambo No. 5 and Boney M.'s Daddy Cool resurfaced in the generator's output, as reported by The Next Web.

The legal nuance is the one that will sting across the industry: the infringement isn't only in what Suno generates, but in the training itself. The court found the model memorised and reproduced the works without authorisation, which leaves the AI industry's standard argument — training is transformative use — limping out of the courtroom.

02

Suno must open its books, with the fine to be calculated later

The ruling orders Suno to disclose the revenue earned from the infringement so damages can be calculated — no figure yet. The company can appeal, and everyone assumes it will, but German law allows the ruling to be enforced in the meantime. For a business charging subscriptions to generate songs on demand, opening its accounts in front of a collecting society is almost worse news than the fine.

And the case doesn't arrive alone. Suno has been dragging another lawsuit from the major labels in the United States since 2024 over training on their catalogues, so what Munich has just decided will be read closely in that courtroom. For GEMA, which filed in January 2025, the conclusion is simple and it has repeated it from day one: whoever wants to train on its catalogue should pay for a licence like everyone else.

Suno's logo over a collage of old sheet music
Image: Suno
03

Munich is becoming AI's duty court

It's not the first time this court has set the pace: last year it ruled against OpenAI for reproducing German song lyrics in ChatGPT, and that decision opened the path GEMA has just walked with full songs. The pattern matters more than the case: while Europe puts up €30 billion to build its AI gigafactories, its courts are writing, ruling by ruling, the rules those machines will have to play by.

Suno can appeal, and it will; until then, every song it generates in Europe plays with a judge in the room.

00

The conversation starts here

Sign in with a supporter account to comment. Sign in

Nobody has commented yet. Want to go first?

KEEP READING

You may also like

FRONT PAGE
Examples of synthetic images carrying Meta's AI info label01OPEN
IA5 MIN

What is AI slop—and are we digging our own grave?

AI has made creation so cheap that the internet can fill with videos, songs and articles nobody needed. The damage begins not when a machine replaces an artist, but when finding anything worthwhile becomes exhausting.